1) value semantics, 2) lifetime checker, 3) typeclasses
I understand what they’re trying to do, but the usability is pretty bad. More work is needed.
-
-
I feel like the issue is using SML, an explicitly academic language - OCaml's module system is far nicer, ime.
-
SML isn't attempting to make modules very ergonomic, but OCaml has done a ton of work in that area
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.