Mozilla: asm.js ? 
-
-
-
and XUL?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
People who write web browsers are C++ programmers so they can't understand anyone wanting to use a dynamic language.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My favorite thing about this thread is: someone trashes JavaScript => a vengeful Brendan Eich suddenly appears
-
Not vengeful, mirthful. I only got tee shirts, no $ for JS. Thesis “JS is awful” needs work if hypothesis for why Netscape embraced Java in ‘95 and (‘96) created LiveConnect. WiB uses “worse” (relative adjective) on purpose. Awful is just awful and would not have survived.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Nestscape: JavaScript?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Java LiveScript was awesome and was used by some of the first interactive, non-refresh live pages! Precursor to ajax! Cbssportsline was one. Real time NCAA basketball scoreboard!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well no shit, JavaScript is awful
-
Which is why it vanquished Java on the client side.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.