This is a bad look, dude.
-
-
Replying to @tqbf
Someone literally said this as part of a public argument. Do you think I'm making it up?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirinDave
It’s the Internet. People say all sorts of things. Also: everyone knows Go is getting some kind of generics. The real point of the comment is just that you don’t like the Go community. Not a great look.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tqbf
I do not like folks in the Golang commt saying, "The datatypes we have are fine for me and anyone else can go fuck themselves." Absolutely. I don't. I hope their hairs ingrow.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirinDave
I never really saw this kind of anger when, for instance, Java was debating closures. Somehow Go just really sets PL enthusiasts off. It’s weird, because Go is _far_ from the worst mainstream language (looking at you ruby)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tqbf @KirinDave
Java embraced PLT, but Go’s designers, particularly Pike, have always been pretty openly contemptuous of the entire PL community. The PL community is reacting in kind. It’s a dumb rivalry in many ways, I agree.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pcwalton @KirinDave
I mean, just be clear that you’re talking STRICTLY about personality. There are ways in which Golang (as a language) is further into PLT than Java.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tqbf @KirinDave
The problem isn’t that Go is *bad*…it’s that it could have been a lot better, and a lot of that is directly traceable to Pike’s personality.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pcwalton @KirinDave
Right, but you can’t say Java is more engaged with PLT than Golang without acknowledging the technical reality of both languages, and that’s what you’re implying.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Java 1.0 was more disengaged from PLT than Go 1.0 was—I won’t argue with that. (Java’s generics are a different story.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.