I’m the weirdo that _doesn’t_ think the Garland SCOTUS outcome was obscene.
-
-
I don’t see anything in the text of Federalist 78 that argues against what I said.
-
You think intense partisan politicization of the Court is what the founders had in mind? The objections to how Garland was treated aren’t objections to the constitutional role of the Senate. People are objecting to the naked partisanship.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
… ironically, Federalist 77 makes a lot of my argument for me. The purpose of “advise and consent” is to restrain the President.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.