Philip BumpOvjeren akaunt

@pbump

National correspondent for The Washington Post. philip.bump@washpost.com pbump@protonmail.com

New York
Vrijeme pridruživanja: ožujak 2007.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @pbump

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @pbump

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    13. ruj 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. [INTERIOR, IOWA DEM PARTY HQ] "how can we make the caucus thing worse"

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. Poništi
  5. People are focused on Shadow because: 1. It has a lamentably nefarious-sounding name 2. There's not much else to focus on Tough luck for Shadow!

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Via Samba TV, second-by-second viewership of the Super Bowl --

    Poništi
  7. "Paul said Tuesday that he supports protections against reprisal for whistleblowers but not necessarily anonymity."

    Poništi
  8. What's important about the Iowa caucus conspiracy theories isn't the what or the how. It's the why.

    Poništi
  9. A corollary to Betteridge's law in which the question is aimed at showing the reader to be an idiot.

    Poništi
  10. The only visible presence of Tulsi Gabbard's campaign in downtown Manchester, N.H. is a big billboard promoting her candidacy. The building it's on is also Buttigieg's campaign headquarters. Which is located in the Gaslight District.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. The most illustrative moment of the trip was when I knocked on a door to ask a high-frequency voter which campaigns she'd heard from and was greeted with loud laughter and a sing-songy "I can't hear you!" in response.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. I spent Saturday checking out what the Democratic campaigns were doing in New Hampshire. With Iowa a muddle, here's my look at how campaigns were trying to talk to voters before the first actual vote next week.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. Trump's team elevated allegations that the 2016 primary was rigged against Sanders to turn them off of Clinton. Iowa gave them good fodder to do so again.

    Poništi
  14. Change the name and (maybe) the day of the week and use this for me, thanks.

    Poništi
  15. 1. 5 isn't 8 2. That includes inactive voters, registrations tagged for removal 3. Only one county has more active voters than it did adult citizens…in 2018, the most recent year of data 4. …the fastest-growing county in the state

    Poništi
  16. Maybe the media's overemphasis on the importance of Iowa extends to analysis of the vote-count problems, too?

    Poništi
  17. [last night] might as well go to sleep and see the results in the morning [in the morning] oh, hmm

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  19. there you go, enjoy

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. As for the caucuses? Even when we used to get results, things were wonky both before and after they landed.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. Judicial Watch decided to allege voter fraud in Iowa, relying on old data, bad math and a failure to understand that populations change in size over time. Conservatives ate it up.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·