Pavel Bažant

@pavel_bazant

Studied theoretical physics but writes some embedded C++ for a living. Interested in Prolog, JetBrains MPS. Not impressed by Unix. Plays the piano, mainly Bach.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2017.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @pavel_bazant

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @pavel_bazant

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj 2018.

    Cool smart nerd: why is it called Football, there's no feet or balls, you should call it Handegg Dumb idiot jock: why is it called Computer Science, it's not science and you don't actually need computers, you should call it Mathematics of Computation

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    hint of the day: Playing a sound backward in Snap!

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    One of the dangers of making abstract sculpture is that you compete with, and lose to, things that are not even even intended to be art.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I don't know if this is deliberate or just emergent from a culture of respect for slogging through complexity of any kind, and the feedback loop it creates of more accidental complexity -> more selection of folks that value this culture.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Going fully remote was nice, but the real benefit was in going fully asynchronous. Here are a list of the benefits we've seen at : A thread 👇🏽

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 29. sij

    But build systems are purity itself: They are the quintessence of boilerplate! 100 % boilerplate!

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    hint of the day: Determining the peak amplitude of a sound in Snap!

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    “The Fundamental Regulator Paradox: The task of a regulator is to eliminate variation, but this variation is the ultimate source of information about the quality of its work. Therefore, the better the job a regulator does the less information it gets about how to improve."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    "Planned work comes from experience, and experience comes from unplanned work.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij

    Posters are a great way to kick off a conversation about your work. Here's your chance to submit one for ! Deadline is Fri 14 Feb 2020. ➡️

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    Hi, hello. I am recruiting for a senior C++ position. You must also know Rust, Kubernetes, JavaScript, PHP, and Brainfuck. We will give you $1 and 0 days off. But we have a ping pong table and beer. Plz work 4 us after 18 rounds of whiteboarding. Ur impressive.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    That's a key lesson that's been missed in general for the last several decades. OOP is more than just passing messages. It's "preserve the links" as much as it's anything.

    Poništi
  14. 24. sij

    "Unix seems disjointed." could we teach Unix to preserve the links?

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij

    I realize I've been awfully vague about what I mean by the term "transcendental narrative". That's deliberate: I dislike premature definition. To misquote Knuth, premature definition is the root of all creative evil.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 24. sij

    "Accepting Ohms makes the resistor selectable."

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    more from the Symbolics Lisp Machine screenshot from the iMac: left a X11 Lisp machine listener showing the documentation of DEFCLASS, right a Web browser showing the Hyperspec static HTML version

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 22. sij

    If a scientific result contradicts experience, the first thing to do is to reconcile those two. This is a win-win. Either you improve yourself, or you improve the science.

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Direct experience is overwhelmingly complex. Science successfully ignores much of this complexity by asking questions whose answers depend on only a tiny fraction of the variables perceptible to us. But to formulate such questions, you need imagination. Experience isn't enough.

    Poništi
  20. 22. sij

    In fact, I think any subject is a worthy vehicle for illustrating higher order thinking. A single subject will not magically install higher order thinking. Your parents' general thinking habits might, though. 3/3

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·