-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Here's my compromise: confirm him, and if they think they've got anything actionable, let them go ahead and try impeachment.
-
So, we're not all together *totally sure* if he's fit to be a Supreme Court Justice", so we should just confirm him and go from there, right. We've turned a few people down as nominees for lifetime appointment to the SCOTUS. We haven't impeached any of them. For good reason.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Odd how Julie Swetnick also spells Kewl Injustice... not confirming Kavanaugh would be an INJUSTICE, but to hip Leftists, that’s KEWL...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Watch for her problem to go away
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And she works for irs? Or has?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And this!!!pic.twitter.com/MZa3DbAllC
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m a suspicious person. I think naming 25 prospects for SCOTUS during the campaign is genius to resolve trust issues & unify Rs around Trump, but it gave Ds time to find histories & “plant” poison ppl’s lies who’s stories bite like this one & Pols get time to erase their steps.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, she sued her former employer for sexual misconduct and won and her lawyer was Katz, the same lawyer representing Ford! Now that ties them all together!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.