Would love to hear more of your thoughts on this. What is wrong with their structure? How would the right structure look?
Interesting, but he's too hard on Jack. You can't fix abuse with mere policy, when you have the wrong structure. https://medium.com/@monteiro/one-persons-history-of-twitter-from-beginning-to-end-5b41abed6c20 …
-
New conversation
-
-
-
He covers that. “a group of white dudes baked the DNA of the platform without thought to harassment or abuse” — the structure’s Jack’s fault
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well said
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Somehow strikes me as ahistorical: Populism (incl. causes and mechanisms) somehow predate Twitter (or Usenet) by quite a bit.
-
All the more so for Fascism and its ilk: I don't think anything that's happening in this area today would surprise a person from the 30s...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s definitely a structural issue. But he does have a point about capitalizing on high-profile abusive behaviour , which made things worse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's still a pretty brilliant read. The polarisation of Twitter and the routine abuse of others deserves to destroy it in its current form.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not seeing how the structure is somehow outside the CEOs responsibility
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.