Sometimes it's a logical fallacy of moderation. Sometimes it's a lack of intellectual or moral courage. But often it's the right answer.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you consider “moderate” to be a purely empirical statistical label, roughly “close to the average/median of the population’s views”?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Platforms like Twitter don't seem to work for moderates. All too often a moderate is treated like an extremist on this polarised platform.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's just "indifferent", misspelled.
-
Or on a different axis. Catholics used to be in a weird place in the American system because they were anti-abortion but also anti-death-penalty. "Too pro life" for the pro-lifers, but clearly not Democrats either.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Those who would use different tools for different jobs are considered centrist by those who only believe in one tool.
-
Communist healthcare and liassez-faire phones aren't individually centrist positions, only when combined.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or when the individual believes that both extremes offer valuable insights on the topic
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm moderate because I judge issues by their merits instead of party platform. Reasonable solutions often opposed for sake of opposition.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.