don’t see how you can get smoke without fire.
It's false that where there's smoke, there's fire. Maybe there's fire. Maybe people just wish there was.
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Many materials will smoke before reaching their ignition temperature. If oxygen is low or absent, fuels will smoke heavily without igniting.
-
So yes there can be smoke without fire.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm amused by the replies to this tweet that discuss its validity as a *physical* claim
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure if you are referencing a specific current event. Otherwise, difficult to have a dialog.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's also literally false. Sometimes there is only smoke, no fire.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.