'Tis tough
One reason nontechnical founders have a higher failure rate is simply that they have to pay one more programmer's salary.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If value margin is that thin that business not worth building anyway
-
That is so wrong. There are plenty of startups where the evolutionary bottleneck is less than a programmer's salary wide. E.g Airbnb.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Painful but (and?) true
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yes 100%
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even technical founder fails sometimes. I think it's more about getting the right people. Doesn't matter technical or not.
-
It certainly matters. There are whole classes of businesses non-temp founders would struggle to imagine
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
also having to trust a single technical opinion, which oftentimes leads to time/money waste. Or even worse, listening to too many opinions
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Reid Hoffman. Benioff. If you want a unicorn, non-technical founders can be OK.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.