And this because researchers have been turned in machines for papers.
Papers publishing negative results "dropped from 30% to 14% between 1990 and 2007." http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Negative results are great. A survey of negative results is awesome. People feel negative results won't pass peer review, so don't publish.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ran into this problem myself. Nobody wants to publish bad results these days.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.