The Democrats would probably learn a lot from trying to figure out why this happened.
-
-
-
I think Dems need to spend more time inspiring and activating non-voters.
-
That is the high bit of this election result for sure: http://paulgraham.com/charisma.html
-
do you think policy will be more important than before in then next election (after this POTUS) or charisma remains most vital
-
Considering the length of its run, I think Occam's Razor = charisma wins for the foreseeable future.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The graphs are not controlled for age, and married people are older. Older people vote more conservatively for obv reasons.
-
Even so it's surprising that Clinton did worse among married women than married men.
-
ugh of course, your original point stands. I got lost in the married vs unmarried comparisons
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
it actually isn't if you read the history on how "security fears" are used to get (mostly white) female voters to turn out
-
They are also "supporting" thier husbands and being "good" girls
-
benevolent sexism
-
on who's part?
-
way too nuanced for 40 char! this is great on benevolent sexism in relation to the election http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/11/15/13571478/trump-president-sexual-assault-sexism-misogyny-won …
-
Pretty complex term
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or is it? Is this not why we try to promote that elections are secret, to avoid coercion?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
data not even from exit polls, varies significantly from published exits. (Trump 'winning' overall by 51% may be clue)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
not to mention the psychology of benevolent sexism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.