"The biggest wins are almost always long. 100→1 is tougher for compounding than 1→100." – Evan Goldfine
-
-
This analysis is complicated somewhat by the large number of broke optimists and well-off (if not wealthy) cynics. Cynicism is safer.
-
Broad cynicism won't get you up in the morning to risk and do something. (I'm still in the long process of shedding my own.)
-
Don't get me wrong; I think most cynics are miserable compared to the optimists. But it can be hard being an optimist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
...as long as the "0" in 1→0 doesn't mean "dead"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Had the same thoughts yesterday
@paulg. -
believing foolishly allows you to make progress and maybe realize you're wrong. Cynicism doesn't?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
neuroplasticity makes optimism easier to practice the more you do it. It compounds twice: both easier to do and stronger.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@paulg if optimist & right, then yes. If optimist & wrong, then no. Same for cynic. So, right compounds > wrong. Not as catchy thoThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Optimism is the faith that leads achievement. Nothing can be done without hope and confidence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but on average they are equal
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
thinking confirmation bias also probably plays into this. The optimist more likely to find ways to make it work than the cynic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
cc Warren B
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.