doesn't seem like that many to me. Could be ideological rather than practical.
"One in five small firms say [over-regulation] is their biggest problem."http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21717838-republicans-and-democrats-have-been-equally-culpable-adding-rulebook-too-much …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
under-regulate and you'll get different problems. Is there ever an objectively optimal regulation level? Or always subjective?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
only 1/5? So not that big of a deal then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's their definition of "Over Regulation"? Ensuring companies treat their staff as Human Beings?
SMHThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And if it turns out "over"-regulation was necessary? When do we just admit that some firms were never actually viable?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This statistic is biased against the small firms that are already gone/never created due to anticipated over-regulation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If only 1 in 5 are bothered by it, what are the other 80% bothered by?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.