Um. Wow. Total disagreement. That sounds horribly exclusive, arrogant and intolerant. Not a fan of that idea.
-
-
-
I notice one adjective you omitted is "false."
-
That wasn't implied? OK: I think your statement is false.
-
There are many senses of normal. Are you saying there are none for which it's true?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
define "normal people"
-
nothing good is gonna come out of this… :S
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
this is a very good reason for companies to stay private longer
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you elaborate?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A fine example of the attitude that makes many startups so dysfunctional.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
made similar argument in a work review: Mgr: ...1-2ppl in co get exceptional (5) Me: Shouldn't we be hiring exceptional ppl? Rcv'd 5
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@paulg akin to Groucho's "I don't want to belong to any club that will accept me as a member"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
'normal people' need to want to work somewhere.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Beg to disagree. What is 'normal'? People are not unidimensional; people can be outstanding and normal at the same time.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
please elaborate on that one
-
You need to be 10x
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
essentially the problem of every big company. Good for us!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what do you want to mean really here!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.