I think Trump may have interpreted the silence between the election and the inauguration as acquiescence.
-
Now that it's clear the answer is yes, he'll face a bigger fight than he anticipated.
People will fight much harder against a president who does bad things than a candidate who says bad things.
-
-
Hopefully. Prepare for the contrary as well: Stanford experiment, etc. Humans gregarious by nature (don't react if not in their face)
-
Stanford prison experiment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment … "We're going to take away their individuality in various ways" --> apathy, powerlessness.pic.twitter.com/J2PU3u42dh
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
with a week of executive actions he wanted to show his base that he would follow through but instead he galvanized the entire world
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Paul, he has always done bad things. Those who voted for him and who chose to not vote HRC have endorsed, empowered & validated evil.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hope you're right but I fear you're wrong... He stated his aims clearly in the campaign & millions voted for him...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
majority of his base doesn't give a damn about the rights of Muslims. They might dig in to spite the "coastal liberal elites"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i really, really, really hope that’s true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's really bad. There is empirical evidence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.