Or the situation represents a vote of no confidence in the management by the IP owner.
The reason not to invest in a company that doesn't own its IP is not that you don't get a share of it. It's because the company will fail.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
agree. This is us >>> https://youtu.be/VJ3Vr40HnLk . Would be interested to hear your thoughts. Launching Q1 2017.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
... This is why the publishing industry doesn't exist, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nike and Apple do similar things. Like w Nike, the owners of Faraday's "IPCo" and "R&DCo" are prob the samehttp://www.wweek.com/news/2016/10/04/new-report-on-offseas-tax-havens-highlights-nikes-actions/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you feel this way about university spin-outs that exclusively license IP?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@redhatopen execs and investors might beg to differ...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most the time. But RedHat doesn't own IP.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what's a good example?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what about open source code?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.