Interesting how you thought of this as an advantage. I thought similarly about entrepreneurial children of wealthy vs. poor families
-
-
-
always the case with the 'perceived' underdog?
-
Yeah... high risks = high rewards. Ability to take higher risks = being in probable spectrum for high rewards too
-
and ofcourse, psychologically, "nets" can be huge enablers if used as safety nets instead of captivity nets
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think it's more accurate to say that Trump was willing to shirk longstanding norms and appeal to base instincts. Hillary wasn't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump's entire worth (image) was on the line, and every media outlet was planning to run gleeful, gloating coverage had he lost
-
this came out before the results. Now imagine this x1000 - hardly a "lark" for a man of his tendenciespic.twitter.com/N1lhLrm8hc
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
one advantage
@HillaryClinton had over@RealRealDonaldT was millions of dollars and total support from almost all mediaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
she represented people who want regime change and waging proxy wars, who forgot that common people dont care about Idlib or Mosul.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
he's obsessed with being a billionaire, hasn't released his taxes, is believed to be in debt, and is profiting from the presidency.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why are you so sure of that? What evidence is there?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
sometimes it works the other way - more skin in the game = better chance of success
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#meh.@HillaryClinton putting Bernie as her 37th choice for VP showed she was willing to be very risky and ignore the voters wishesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
quite the opposite IMO
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Disagree. The one more hungry to win is likelier to win. Trump was less likely to win by those stds. He won bcoz he changed the game
-
and also because Clinton campaign startegy and narrative control was horrific. Podesta was a disaster.
-
Conway, a disastrous person herself, succeeded in setting the bar so low that trump just had to give up twitter for a week to win
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
indirectly an argument for more tenure in academia ;) Take more risk!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(speaking from Europe) why did she need to win?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.