Not just that. Clinton got more votes, but they were in the wrong places.
-
-
-
Point taken, but the polling was far enough off that I don't know if the campaigning was optimally allocated.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@paulg You could've said "in democracies people with cultural & economic power shouldn't ignore the cultural & economic anxieties the many" -
William of Ockham would not have approved.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
so US Presidential Elections are like US high school class president Elections? A popularly contest? WTF!
-
I wasn't buying this but now I actually do: people vote for charisma when they're not educated enough to see past it
-
...& America in general isn't educated enough
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You had it right. I've always sworn by your "charisma theory", but I couldn't bring myself to believe what was right in front of me.
-
Even I couldn't.
-
Included this Twitter exchange in my post-Election reaction. https://ruinedchapel.wordpress.com/2016/11/11/post-election-analysis-part-1/ … Would love to know your thoughts, if you want.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
that is just untrue. She lost because she is the poster person of status quo, beaten twice by a messenger of change (Obama & Trump).
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
but feel free to keep believing everyone is just dumber and easily swayed by the superficial.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
DNC is at fault for anointing her over Sanders. Hillary has zero charisma. She might make a good bureaucrat, but not a leader.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trumps charisma: identified many real problems & proposed bold solutions. Clinton's lack: said everything is fine, except nonissues.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@msuster Perhaps@realDonaldTrump victory was too complex fr valley intellectuals to decipher, except PeterTheil every 1 got it wrongThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@hitRECordJoe How do you explain to a 47 year old that a ignorant demagogue won? -
Because he engaged with the voters and talked about the issues that people actually care about.
-
I thought Americans were proud dishonest fraudulent liar not fit to lead will be impeached
-
actually maybe USA got the president the deserve
-
I agree they did get the one they deserve after not electing
@RonPaul in 2008 and 2012.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.