No. Dialogue/discovery. Same as if one discovered a partner attended a David Duke rally or donated money to an anti-Semitic charity.
-
-
You started this by saying something was uncontroversial. But now we know what the something is, that's pretty controversial.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only the ones who have given $$$$$$$$ to the candidate + spoke at the convention + refused to disavow candidate's racist remarks +
-
-- that's the deal. even aside from trump, i'd stop associating with thiel just on the basis of what he himself has said.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
+ engaged themselves to speak at a forum alongside white supremacists + serve on board/as partner in firms w/dismal diversity efforts
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, I think the preponderance of evidence--if they refused to dialogue--points to, "We must part, b/c our core values don't match."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You asked what I would do. As an immigrant who'd be mentoring immigrants + working on recruiting underrepresented minorities--
-
I wouldn't hopefully be in this position b/c from Day One I'd recruit diverse staff & board members so it was clear where I/we stand.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
But again (!!!!) --firing/severance is the last last last resort. I believe in grace, dialogue, 2nd/3rd chances, working with people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
