first thought to mind is more complex code equals more complex security flaws?
Unnecessary code is not as harmless as I used to think. It sends the misleading signal that it's necessary.
-
-
-
Compliexity is the enemy of Security.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
like in language!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah it’s a cancer. Spreads unless excised. Eventually recurs anyway. Shortens product lifetime. And so on.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
IME, bugs/LOC is relatively constant. Therefore, single biggest contributor to bugs is LOC. Code itself is evil
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's why deleting code is often more enjoyable than writing it. Like you're seeing through that ruse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"The cheapest, fastest, and most reliable components are those that aren't there." - Gordon Bell
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so unbelievably true. Every time I start working on a migration the first thing we have to do is identify and remove unused code.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that's the rational justification for minimalism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's the harmful effect of the signal?
-
Really, just trying to understand..
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.