a volume disbalance would normally be an indication that people disagree with the odds.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
People who bet on
@realDonaldTrump hedging?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Selection bias? Likely that the Trump Cohort is under-represented among participants in prediction markets.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because winning on Trump also means you lose everything because of end of the world, end of the dollar, stock crash, etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
for trump action you should multiply by odds, still a 3X difference though
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
not all such actions have a rational explanation. An example is the odds/volumes with the BRExit on Smarkets. Arbitrage?
-
didnt you think so? bet remain move line then buy short positions in financials, nobody saw it coming
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Question has no answer. You would have to ask each & every Punter why they wagered what they wagered.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A Bookies goal is not to create a true probability, don't try to think of a Bookies odds as a Win Probability.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- arbitrage (mismatched odds) - different odds (↑ odds ⇒ lower bet to win
$N) - hedging (Trump winning perceived as bad for USD) -
I highly doubt that there is a lot of arbitrage going on here, tuff to Arb fixed odds bets. Spread betting much better for Arb.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.