Cause 2 data pts is how trends are found right?
-
-
-
When the data points are counterexamples, one is enough.
-
Implying people think business controlling politics is universal and pervasive rather than strategically targeted.
#strawman
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Personally I'd rather it didn't take that sort of event to prove this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Both phenomena have yet to see a concrete resolution. When Trump is president and article 50 is triggered, tweet this again.
-
I was wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
intentionally control no, unintentionally yes: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jul/12/how-technology-disrupted-the-truth …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
when you use an exception and tout it as the standard, everyone loses. Same case here, both are exceptions, hence the phenomenon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that's not true Paul. Both phenomenon happened as a direct result of that. I think what you mean to say was "votes" not "politics"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One could always click on
#goldman hashtag... Big Business DOES have interests.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
policies, not politics. You still can vote, but is not as meaningful as you think it is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think you may be overestimating conspiracy theorists' capacity to apply Bayes' law to their beliefs : )
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The sample size could be a bit larger here, and these could also be long tail exceptions to the usual.
-
.
@paulg FWIW just received Chomsky's latest book today (published May 2016) and it begins on this very topic.pic.twitter.com/I2pVfr1gC6
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How'd you figure that re Brexit? Newspapers made money. Hedge Funds made money. Everyone had a stake.
-
Big business was clearly mostly pro Remain. And rightly so as they could suffer under Brexit.
-
That's not necessarily true either. Major exporters expect (and have received) huge increase in orders from £ v €/$
-
I'm not saying many of them didn't benefit, just that most were pro remain.https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/mar/15/cbi-member-survey-reveals-huge-support-for-remaining-in-eu …
-
Which is my point to PG's original blanket statement. There's people with a stake on both sides, trying to influent result.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.