Can you explain this to me? :)
People have much higher confidence in their understanding of something before trying to explain it than after.http://goo.gl/7yTEbG
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is no can opener to "understand". There's no chariot. There's no object you can label inc. Self. :) http://www.dhammawiki.com/index.php?title=Anatta …
-
aka The tweet of an essay is not the essay. The essay is the essay. Also, headline of a news is not the news. Its a (false) label.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(Trigger warning: If you write essays people respond to with tweets, reading this will bring back many painful memories.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this is why good, logic, honest, well-documented writing is so helpful –and difficult– to writers.
-
you may consider trying to explain things using SVO-pb syntax. Subject Verb Object - Present tense, no "to-be" verbs.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Meaningness I've found my understanding improves when I try to explain something using simple words & relating it to an example -
you may consider explaining things using SVO-pb syntax. Subject Verb Object - Present tense, no "to-be" verbs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think it was in "Let over Lambda" where D. Hoyte stated "nobody really understands Macros", which made sense to me as a beginner
-
I understand macros. But I'd agree about doubly nested backquotes.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.