@paulg Paul if we didn't follow arbitrary rules like this what would judges and lawyers do?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg@laurenkrisai@reason That's not what happened. Convicted for his intentional role in burglary. No sympathy. -
@paulg@laurenkrisai@reason He admitted to police he knew his friends were going to use car for burglary. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@paulg Holt is an abuse but the rule means a gang of robbers can't use a "the other guy pulled the trigger" defense which is a good thingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg have you been following the UK courts recently? Something similar was finally overturned (can’t find a link rn)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg Why didn't same "no car, no crime" logic apply to gun shop? Firearms maker?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg i read that from corner of my screen as Ryan Hale
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ChrisMarkl
@paulg Except that it isn't (in article at least). If test is simply "No car, no crime", Chevy should be convicted of murder tooThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg Odd that states don’t take the same logic to gun manufacturers : “No gun, no murder” -
@tweetatweir@paulg@DarkSideGeek it doesn't apply to gun manufacturers, the rule is only applied when the defendant has committed felony - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.