Surely it should be both?
-
-
-
If your startup is good, and you're merely clear, it will be exciting as well.
-
That's a different point. The point is there's no need to sacrifice excitement for clarity. If you're not excited, why should investors be?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@paulg this is literally what I tell startups all the time - took me a long time to learn this lessonThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg I think is really hard to make an investor excited - provide facts and vision and let the investor excite themselves (or not) - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@paulg is the implication that an investor needs a sanitized message or that clear communications helps drive a close/sale? -
-
-
New conversation -
-
-
.
@paulg@dhovekamp42 do you think@theranos pitch to their investors was clear or impressive? -
-
@dhovekamp42@3dimmune@paulg@theranos that's the point. I can say I can build the time machine. It is clear and impressive too.#puffing -
-
@dhovekamp42@3DiMMUNE@paulg@theranos Theranos has lost all credibility. They are now poison
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@paulg "We plan to sell things for more than they cost to make."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg Why can't it be both - or does more impressive automatically imply less clear?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes. Similar to TV commissioning here.. but probably not applicable in Hollywood : )
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.