In a way the volume of ad hominems is a good sign. It implies I didn't leave much to refute. http://paulgraham.com/disagree.html
-
@paulg I think mostly it means folks got mad, not anything good or bad about your correctness.
@kragen When people get mad, at least some of them look for something to refute.
-
-
@paulg I'm not sure any correlation beyond just more people reading it is positive. Mad people get dumb. -
@paulg I thought Seth Bannon's response was the least bad of a mostly pretty worthless set of responses. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.