In a way the volume of ad hominems is a good sign. It implies I didn't leave much to refute. http://paulgraham.com/disagree.html
-
@paulg You should judge your success by the quality of the best refutations, not the volume of the worst. Truthfulness isn't voted upon.
@harryh Good point. But it at least means there are no glaring mistakes.
-
-
@paulg "economic inequality is bad and should be eliminated" <-- reduced != eliminated. Very glaring mistake. VERY. -
@harryh A lot of people believe the ideal to aim for is zero inequality. It was the default view of the English left in the 1970s. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.