![🏴{ [ RJ Miller ] }🏴](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1113708717164376064/nGtJDU4F_normal.png)
@paulg You should judge your success by the quality of the best refutations, not the volume of the worst. Truthfulness isn't voted upon.
In a way the volume of ad hominems is a good sign. It implies I didn't leave much to refute. http://paulgraham.com/disagree.html
-
-
-
@harryh Good point. But it at least means there are no glaring mistakes. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg I think mostly it means folks got mad, not anything good or bad about your correctness. -
@kragen When people get mad, at least some of them look for something to refute. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@paulg an alternative reading is that your essay was justly regarded as being bad. But you're free to deceive yourselfThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg I think you are asking for Disqus 2.0 ----- Or a Disqus disruptor? What would it be? What could it be? -
@paulg Paul Graham Asks For Disqus 2.0 Or A Disqus Disruptor http://technbiz.blogspot.com/2016/01/paul-graham-asks-for-disqus-20-or.html …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@paulg shouldnt someone with deep understanding of math about inequality give a formal approval/refute? You have more, create jobs and shareThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg or that its a personal topic for you, and thus ad hominens are the low-hanging fruit.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.