Today in Paul's implicit assumptions: that only the initial selection bias affects outcomes, not later biases.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/660534510379888640 …
@kevinmarks It doesn't apply when you're showing bias *exists*. It means FRC's 63% number is a lower bound on their bias.
-
-
@paulg if their female founder numbers look like YC's, I'd be surprised if there are enough to be statistically significant. -
@kevinmarks Should I take this resort to (inaccurate) snark as a sign you've been refuted? -
@paulg last time we discussed this you said the figures were inaccurate, but refused to give accurate ones https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tZVHgKnNS5ghjkQou4QOyQtQWX9sURgSMVYgyC76z-Q/edit?usp=sharing … -
@paulg isn't that the methodology you were suggesting was flawed? What does your own bias test show about YC? -
@kevinmarks My kids just knocked on my door in their costumes, and I am having this conversation on Twitter. That is so wrong. So bye. -
@paulg have a wonderful
Halloween
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.