@paultoo Good point. Such a strange choice. I wonder what the numbers would look like with Uber included.
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
@paulg Works only with infinite pools of applicants. If First Round funded 100% of elite college students, could still get same results -
@terzicigor In practice not. In practice there is a huge supply of people who went to elite colleges yet aren't very good.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
@paulg Did you come up with it? It is brilliant and I need to know who to credit -
@tommyjensen I didn't learn about it from someone else, but I would be surprised if no one else had thought of it.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
@paulg Problem: If one group *is* inherently better than another, you would expect better perf from that group even under fair selection -
@paulg So this test works for groups you expect to be roughly equal (men/women?) but not for those you expect to be different (colleges) - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
@paulg Does the converse work? If a subgroup underperforms, does that imply a positive bias? -
@geepokey Yes, but because of the definition of bias rather than any feature of this technique. - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
@paulg After some thought, I don't think this method is robust against an active adversary seeking to hide bias against select subgroups. -
@paulg I think you'd have to consider the sub-group distributions and make sure that they are at least the same shape. - Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.