@paulg But not all conversations on the Internet!
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Bullshit. Not all conversations! “
@paulg: Many conversations on the Internet: Person 1: ∃x P(x) Person 2: -(∀x P(x))!” -
-
New conversation -
-
-
Many conversations on the Internet: Person 1: ∃x P(x) Person 2: -(∀x P(x))! (
@paulg) - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
RT “
@paulg: Many conversations on the Internet: Person 1: ∃x P(x) Person 2: -(∀x P(x))!”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From the "Jokes I Will Never Get" file: RT
@paulg: Many conversations on the Internet: Person 1: ∃x P(x) Person 2: -(∀x P(x))! -
@ericberlinct - = "not", ∀ = "all"
-
.
@JanglerNPL@tshellstudio "Jokes That Are More Easily Explained Than I Thought But For Which I Am Still Not The Right Audience."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@paulg another popular theme: Person 1: for most x, P(x) Person 2: there is x s.t. not P(x) ! - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@paulg not all conversations are like that! Oh waitThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@paulg@kelleher_ Recently thought many policy arguments are: "There's no difference." "But there is a difference in differences."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg it is not true that all conversations go that way! ;-)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg interestingly, mere existential quantification is the best option for the meaning of bare plurals as in "bees make honey"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg ahh good old existential quantifiersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg what does `-' mean? a negation(¬)? -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.