.@paulg amazing how neatly all humans fall between those two categories. Great job articulating this important, nuanced point.
-
-
-
@mykola Those are not (obviously) the only two kinds of people, just two whose outcomes are instructive to compare. -
.
@paulg almost nobody falls into those categories, though. This sounds like an attempt to cast yourself into some oppressed role.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg What if you ask groups of only carefully orthodox, and they consider their non-failures as successes?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@paulg Depends on how you define success!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg Important to make a distinction b/t purposeful, reasoned rashness and being dangerously uncircumspect.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on context “
@paulg: who succeed, the bold and big-hearted but occasionally impolitic, or the small-souled but carefully orthodox?”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg I presume your question is meant to categorize groups, not pass judgment on the individuals in those groups...?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg too many SAT words here....Can't figure out who succeeds.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.