Paul GrahamVerified account

@paulg Shame most digital photos not on Facebook are lost so easily.

@paulg clothing optional?

@paulg @semil words of wisdom!

or pets. RT “@paulg: The photos you'll care about later will be the ones with people in them.”

@paulg that doesn’t mean they have to suck.

@paulg And if you want a photo without people, there's probably a better one on Wikipedia or Flickr.

@paulg more like machine recongnized people, in specific places, time and mood with auto captured snippets of all the above

“@paulg: The photos you'll care about later will be the ones with people in them.” @shots ...er, nope! That's note these then.

@paulg I agree, which seems to beg the question, what values do a heavily selfie-weighted photoset betray?

this is so true as observed going through old albums “@paulg: The photos you'll care about later will be the ones with people in them.”