@paulg paper is from June 1982. I think the dupe checking would be much better now. (Referees may still suck).
What happens if you resubmit published psychology articles with fake authors:http://bit.ly/LZ0G4O
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg Sure, publication decisions aren't reliable. But our real problem is so much medical research isn't valid. http://goo.gl/7x40Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg Correction: "happened".Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@paulg Article misleads: Most papers are rejected/criticized, revised, then published. Published papers probably initially criticized too.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.