It’s kind of weird how we expect so much from charities and social work yet generally revile any attempt to pay their workers any more than the bare minimum.
-
I only became aware of the problem a couple months ago, because the people running nonprofits mostly suffer in silence till they burn out and quit. But it is a big focus for me now and I have a lot of ideas I want to try.
They range from the simple expedient of unilaterally paying people more, to factoring burnout into big donors' impact calculations, to new ways for nonprofits to offer programs "off the shelf" and thus avoid being micromanaged.
-
-
The Effective Altruism framework says it is preferable to pay big bucks to workers if it produces even greater outcome gains. i.e., outcomes > overhead
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
if you want another free idea here
@paulg one thing could also be having donors include impact on grantee employees lives as part of their impact metrics — so every time you raise pay it becomes not just an addition to your cost accounting but direct evidence of benefitThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.