Don't collect celebrity investors. It's not a predictor of success. In fact, it may be a predictor of failure, because it's a sign that founders (a) lack confidence and (b) prefer fundraising to building stuff.
-
-
This feels like a hot take generalization. Getting buy in (and money) from celebrities is an impossible task for an unknown founder. Speaks volumes in a positive way, really.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please go into more detail. What are historical examples?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And the founders seem to have the attitude that 2 birds in the bush is better than one in the hand. They totally overthink their investor line-up vs. closing good offers quickly and getting back to work.
-
It’s all about crossing the chasms and organic growth is much more sustainable in the long run
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Although one pro of “celebrity” investors is that they have more skin in the game, they not only risk their money but their reputation too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It feels like you’re talking about a broader phenomenon that I also see: where the founders are completely absorbed in fundraising, promoting and dealing, and the substance of the enterprise falls to the wayside. “Fyre Festival” syndrome.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry
@paulg, that's a lame answer.@Jason was spot on. However, I disagree that having celebrities is good since it distorts market signals. How can one really know if it's a great business model when early customer are blinded by the celebrity.#Lean#Startup#CustomerDevThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.