Wikipedia, a nonprofit platform run by a decentralized network of volunteer moderators, has almost entirely escaped the tech policy conversation around content moderation. What can we learn from Wikipedia?
Show this thread
-
-
Why? (I have my hypothesis.)
-
Critics see it as a smoking gun that something exploitive is going on, zero sum thinking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
*laughs in adult*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Answer: a lot. In particular, Wikipedia as a project works because any volunteer editor can eventually be empowered to curate.
End of conversation
-
-
-
You mean criticism is proportionate to damage. How many people have been radicalized on Wikipedia?
-
And how many child porn rings have been uncovered on Wikipedia? How many kids (and adults) have mental health issues due to Wikipedia? How many insurrection attempts were planned on Wikipedia? What a disappointing response.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Criticism is proportionate to damage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True not only for money. Good looks f.e. as well. Hate proportionate to superiority.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mo’ money, mo’ problems
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.