Almost everyone I know who started startups wanted to a) make enough that they could work on what they wanted without worrying about money (like $5-10 million) & b) make something cool. None of them would've cared about what would happen to their $50,000,001 dollar when starting.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1366761772594704390 …
-
-
Yup, it would certainly influence some founders. Which is why I said 'Almost everyone.' I think the disagreement is on whether that influence is enough to matter. My argument is no, especially if a wealth tax is combined with strengthening America's other advantages for startups.
-
Those advantages are fading or non existent.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For founders who are US citizens by birth, switching countries might not seem appealing. But many founders are not born in the US. Especially now that companies are going remote, it would be easy for them to leave. Or never come to the US in the first place.
-
if you're trying to convince me that we need better global coordination in order to collect capital wherever it lies, you're succeeding!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would influence founders that once they get to a high valuation, they would be forced to relinquish ownership and control of their creation to Blackrock, Vanguard, and hedge fund managers to afford to pay the wealth tax.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.