When linking on Twitter to something you've written that could be controversial, give people as little to engage with in the tweet itself as possible. Then (a) they'll have to actually read at least some of it before responding, and (b) you don't give them much to quote-tweet.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @paulg
Max Kennerly Retweeted Max Kennerly
I read it and did the math.https://twitter.com/MaxKennerly/status/1366571851636473859 …
Max Kennerly added,
Max KennerlyVerified account @MaxKennerlyIn your example, the person will be worth $200 million after 12 years and a billionaire after 33 years. With a 2% tax on wealth over $50m, they'd be worth $200 million after 13 years and a billionaire after 40 years. That's enough to stop them from starting a company? Come on. https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1366445681251123214 … pic.twitter.com/zQ9rEF6Ej81 reply 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @MaxKennerly
If decreasing the returns from starting a startup never decreases people's interest in doing it, you can prove by induction that you can confiscate all the returns without decreasing their interest.
7 replies 0 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @paulg @MaxKennerly
Whereas YC got a big spike in applications after The Social Network came out, and the reason that movie even got made was that this young guy becoming super rich made for an exciting story.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @paulg @MaxKennerly
But do you actually think the priority of the government should be maximizing the number of startups over anything else? Clearly these things exist on a spectrum and we can talk about which variables to tweak without pretending anybody wants to take 100% of returns.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @boucher @MaxKennerly
Surely no reasonable person would believe that. Why are you wasting my time attributing beliefs to me that I neither stated nor hold?
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @paulg @MaxKennerly
You brought up confiscating all the returns as the logical end point of the argument that a small wealth tax wouldn’t discourage anyone from starting a company. Surely no reasonable person is advocating for taking all the returns, so why bring it up?
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
It was a proof by reductio ad absurdum. Surely that's obvious.
-
-
It’s nonsense threads like these where people don’t use basic reading comprehension that makes limiting replies so valuable
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.