The thing I find most baffling about the McNeil story is the time frame. He’s forced out two years after the alleged incident—and there have been no new complaints in the intervening years? What an utter failure of management.
Show this thread
-
This kind of time lag (it has occurred in many other cases) is proof that, whatever the company claims, the person wasn't actually fired for the incident in question, but because the company feared bad publicity about it.
Someone should write about this phenomenon and give a name to the time gap. Then there would be something concrete to accuse employers of when they did it.
-
-
Mind the gap
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s not creative but just calling it the McNeil gap would work. Not gonna do the hard work of writing about it tho
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's being fired for being a PR liability akin to the Hollywood morals clause. Plenty of people kept working while doing immoral things. What got someone fired was being unwilling to cooperate in whatever remediation was demanded.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.