Something we may see more of: Many people in some industry move to some lower-tax jurisdiction, and as a result it becomes a genuine hub of that industry.https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-02-19/-everyone-s-here-microstate-is-unlikely-hub-for-youtube-stars …
-
-
Logan Paul is moving to Puerto Rico for the exact same reason.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Efficiency can, unfortunately, mean underinvestment in infrastructure.
-
By definition it cannot.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Andorra has no army, neither huge empty landmass that trains and highways have to cross to connect cities. But still probably way more efficient in their competences.
-
America’s flat tax and low tax crowd has no issue paying for a $1 trillion military. It’s pretty much everything else they hate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is no trade off. Singapore have a huge state in scope (welfare, public housing, state owned companies) but a very limited state in scale (tax rates low, small population) mainly because they have a efficient government. The best real world example of the Tiebout Model.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Race to the bottom gets prevented by things like when your power grid collapses during a freeze and you learn that maybe there's a service you might want to buck up on for the sake of future residents.
-
Is that where San Francisco’s high taxes are going, to make its power grid ultra reliable?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
People don’t live in Monaco because it’s more efficiently run A race to the bottom is a real risk. In fact it is already happening The solution is a floor on Government taxation rates agreed internationally for the wealthy... very hard to achieve in practice given power dynamic
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.