We need to go beyond linking to http://archive.is versions of misleading media articles. We need a non-US website that lets editing groups copy and *annotate* media articles, denying them ads, and restoring missing facts, context, full quotes, papers, and linked sources.
-
-
A US citizen living in the US can't do this. You need an Alexandra Elbakyan.
-
Disagree. Commentary is protected as fair use. If someone is interested in putting in the work, I'd be glad to host it and take responsibility.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's not more important than AGI risk, and I don't know how to do something this size without quitting my job. (I made a previous pass at doing something similar, without that being my fulltime job, just in case that was possible for me; and it wasn't; but worth checking.)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What are the incentives for the editors?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Indeed that’s definitely needed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any way to turn this into something that could get funded or are the legal issues involved slash media retaliation too obviously dealbreakers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doesn't this run into "don't start a forum"? It all comes down to better filtering, I think.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.