Word in only as good as the action.
Ideologues think they can further their aims by taking over prestigious institutions. But it doesn't work for the same reason debasing coinage doesn't work. "The New York Times says..." doesn't have anything like the force it did 20 years ago.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
idk that’s just because the overall regard for the press has diminished but it still has a lot more force than other similar institutions
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What? The NYT does the both sides schtick for everything how are they taken over by ideologues?
-
"both sides" like "lets print someone moderate from our side and find someone insane radical from other side" ?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Trust can’t be printed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The 2020 equivalent is "
@elonmusk tweets...."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bad money drives out good :: Bad thought drives out good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
there is no such thing as no ideology, and your posts tend to imply that so...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Although "The New York Times says..." no longer has the intellectual force it once did, among the ideological-afflicted it may have *more* force.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.