So, actually, they will support cases providing Substack more visibility and PR returnspic.twitter.com/wP6Hl8FHD6
"We will use our financial and legal resources to vigorously oppose any bad-faith efforts to dissuade Substack writers from doing their work."https://blog.substack.com/p/legal-support-for-substack-writers …
-
-
-
Those are gonna be the cases that matter though
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Lol this will be good
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They can avoid this dilemma if they stick to being a platform and not an aggregator
End of conversation
-
-
-
“Substack will make the ultimate choice on who is accepted into the program and which cases to support.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Magazine/newspaper publishing, legal, editorial, HR services for non-magazine/newspaper writers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Greenwald’s gonna love that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did they just make themselves a target?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why do writers choose Substack before this legal support program? I always thought legal support is the biggest disadvantage of independent writing vs. big news outlet. Without this, how did substack grow when Medium and Wordpress already exist?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.