Work with people you genuinely like and respect, and that you have known long enough to be sure..
Something that needs a name: the SIDR, or standard intellectually dishonest response. E.g. when you argue against banning the expression of some category of ideas, the SIDR is to claim that you personally espouse all such ideas.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The closest thing that comes to my mind is the motte and Bailey fallacy ssc people are familiar with
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Brains are made to cheat and work at the lowest level of energy consumption possible as long as the organism can live and reproduce. Unfortunately, that does not mesh well with a worldwide system where people can instantaneously read opinions and immediately type in a reply.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is fetch.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To clarify would Jack Dorsey's responses to Ted Cruz come under this category? Or were those standard intellectualised dishonest responses?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hypocrisy, virtue signaling is in the same box.
-
Add Bigoteering
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe a variant of a thought terminating cliche:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clich%C3%A9#Thought-terminating_clich%C3%A9 …
-
Thanks for sharing that Jason
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.