There are reasons why they remain journalists/arm chair CEOs rather than a leader of a company. It is much easier to write negative op-eds about companies than leading a company
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Partially true but truer is they understand what gets eyes balls and a story like this will get talked about and read much more than, say, a tension-free story about how it’s collegial post resignation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fixed pie thinkers, every one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Everyone selling their own versions of clickbait
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's difficult for normies to see the long term value of tech when it is the primary cause of instability in their lives (job loss, social media etc.) thinking long term requires security for most people. Tech reporters are normies trying to communicate tech to other normies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The media specializes in zero sum.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It doesn’t seem like you’ve assimilated the fact that many of them don’t care and for many of them the clicks are more important.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They don't care. Most "reporters" are marketers first. Gotta get the eyeballs to pay for the "research".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We should encourage the “growth market” behavior. How could we make the word not see zero sum?
-
Maybe the word “market” makes it seem limited? Maybe something like “Growth Space”, “Growth Atmosphere” , “Growth Glalaxy” , etc
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.