I don't think that's the explanation, because the odds at all the betting sites heavily favored Hillary in the early stages of the vote count on election day in 2016.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
A lot of bookies also offload their risk on betfair.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Betfair's odds are not a predictor. They are a reflection of how much cash people are willing to stake on a specified outcome to derive a profit. The amount of profit (incentive) varies considerably over time (unlike polls). Odds over time reflect profit potential when placed.
-
If you look at a 538 chart, you'll find it gets much closer to accurate as the event approaches. The betting markets do the same thing, but they are limited by a shortage of contrarian thinkers willing to take the (increasingly obvious) easy money. Is there a model in that...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
538's number is from their own model Betfair is determined by the market I think the market is pricing in polling error (partisan or low-trust non-response)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Money on a trump victory would be the *smart* bet as he polled bad and won in 2016. Bettors would imagine they get better odds with Trump
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, counterpoint: The election is also determined by ill-informed voters.
-
The "unusually" part is an assumption
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Didn't 2016 teach us anything about polls?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.