Just realized that Jessica and I have donated more to defeating Trump than to any other cause. Which sucks. As in literally sucks huge amounts of money away from important problems. This is a hidden but very significant cost of increasing polarization.
-
I don't quite understand ... have you contributed to make polarization increase or decrease?
In this particular case, to mitigate its consequences. Polarization brought us a president radically unfit for office, so we have to spend a lot to get him out.
-
-
polarized people don't view themselves as polarized. You're polarized, and contributing to polarization.
-
I'm fairly sure I'm not, considering that I'm simultaneously being vilified by SJWs on another thread.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The real cause is the non democratic distribution of electoral college votes and senate seats, tho. Polarization has nothing to do with that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Too many people are being blindfully pulled into the spotlight of direct fight with the symptom (Trump), which is a loose-loose, while neglecting the real cause: center-to-slightly-conservative voters' concerns not being properly addressed by liberal agendas.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If only the other guy would stop being so polarized, I wouldn't have to do this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
> radically unfit This is kind of a weak argument. And there’s a contingent of people who clearly didn’t want someone who had been through a couple of cycles in the political wash. Not that I agree with them, I’d prefer experience and, well, rationalityhttps://www.thoughtco.com/does-president-need-political-experience-4046139 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.